When I was fifteen, I wrote a fan letter to one of my favorite authors. She wrote back. I still have the postcard. The back was a drawing of a dragon standing before a podium preparing to give a lecture. The title of the lecture was:
Anne McCaffrey: Fact or Myth?
As a teen, I read every book of hers I could get my hands on. I remember walking into the local grocery story with a neighbor when the third Pern book, Dragonsong, came out. A copy was sitting in the spinning rack by the door. I hadn’t even know that there was going to be another Pern book. I was so ecstatic, that this neighbor—who hardly knew me ( I was a friend of her son but didn’t know her well)—bought me the book. That was a pretty extraordinary thing back then.
I was really grateful.
I loved her books. I loved her stories. I thought her science fiction, especially The Ship Who Sang. There were things that happened in that book, science fiction concepts, that I still think about. The thing I liked best of all, however, was Lessa of Pern.
People talk about strong female characters today. Sometimes they mean kickbutt fighters. But when the term first got started, it meant females who held their own, who acted and achieved and accomplished, female characters who were smart.
Lessa was all that. To me, she was the sole female character in SF who really had the qualities I wanted to have. I adored her.
Recently, I was in a store and I picked up a copy of Dragonflight, the original Pern book. I remember thinking, Huh, it probably wasn’t that good. I’ve just glamorized it. Let me see… After all, some of her later books were a bit fluffy. Maybe this early book was just fluff, too, and I had just not noticed. I started flipping through it.
I read an astonishing amount of it before I realized I was standing in a bookstore and embarrassedly put it down.
It was still that good.
Today, author Jon Del Arroz was chatting about his upcoming book on Twitter, and the fact that the title of his book Star Realms: Rescue Run is an homage to Anne McCaffrey came up. A writer at review site SF Bluestocking responded:
I’d recommend broadening your horizons.
Anything written in the last 15 years is
more relevant than McCaffrey’s entire oeuvre.
I don’t know what is more shocking to me:
That this person who supposedly reviews SF spoke so lightly of this Grand Master who changed the field and who still sells today.
That a person who is so old-fashioned as to use the Victorian term bluestocking shows not regard for the past.
That she apparently thinks that my books and Mr. Del Arroz’s books—both written in the last 15 years—are more relevant than Anne McCaffrey’s. (An astonishing compliment, but neither of us have earned such praise, at least as of yet.)
Anne McCaffrey is still relevant, to storytelling, to our field, to life!
And she still sells!
Jon Del Arroz speaks about this incident in his post: The Cult of the New