I’ve written a few sex scenes …. by “few” I mean two, and [easyazon_link asin=”1482052326″ locale=”US” new_window=”default” nofollow=”default” tag=”superversivesf-20″ add_to_cart=”default” cloaking=”default” localization=”default” popups=”default”]they were in the same book[/easyazon_link]. However, the “sex scene” was in someone’s dream, and the protagonist was having a conversation with his dead wife through most of it. The sex was incidental, and mostly has to do with the fact that she was killed on their honeymoon. The second sex scene was so vague, any less detail would be as clear as a Salvatore Dali painting, only with words.
Yes, I brought in Dali to an article on sex. I’m weird. However, there is a point.
Even during these scenes, there’s no blow by blow description. (I’m going to stop apologizing for that phrase, just roll with it). They aren’t necessary, unless someone’s writing porn. Even something as intimate as noticing a tattoo on someone during sex doesn’t necessitate that much detail — the audience does not need to know what specific act the individual was doing when s/he noticed the tattoo. It’s sex. Nudity happens. Next chapter.
In the case of DC Comics, they decided to go back to the 1990s, where the artistic style was summarized as “Big boobs, big guns.” The current version seems to focus on women and sexuality, with an overemphasis on the sex.
Nightwing’s reaction is such that you suspect he’s glad that he has to go and face the end of the world.
And that was it. One panel. Move on. It was played for comedic effect. The alien culture was very much what is referred to as “serial monogamy.” Starfire would FALL IN LOVE with a fellow and they would actually have a relationship. Sadly, today, the most startling thing about this is that she fell in love first, THEN started with sex.
DC decided to fix that.
And by posing, I don’t mean “for seducing the guy she’s targeted for seduction.” I mean in weird, contortionist-like ways that are only useful for modeling.
Modeling what, I’m not entirely certain, but, still ….
What was the point of that scene? Aside from “we’re pandering to hormonal males who can’t buy Playboy“? Anyone? Anyone at all? Bueller? Bueller?
Someone ran out of room for a plot in this issue, didn’t they? Starfire is a woman who can quite literally level city blocks. And DC decided to dedicate a whole page to her trying to jump someone’s bones, with another page dedicated to “Gee, she looks good in a bikini.” Really? They couldn’t think of something she could blow up?
Notice I have not pointed out her barely there costume. The “reasoning” is that she absorbs solar energy through her skin, and the less she wears, the more surface area is used…..
Funny, twenty years ago, when Superman just came back from the dead and needed an enhanced recharge from the sun, he had to wear a form-fitting black suit to increase his solar intake.
But then, that was before 300 and chiseled, CGI generated 8-pack abs were “in.”
Also strange: she needs to bear more skin for more solar energy absorption, but she wears thigh-high boots, covering a lot of that surface area. If her powers honestly worked like that, it’s time to invest in sandals.
So, to recap: Does this entire setup tell us anything about the character? Nothing new. Does it add anything to the plot? Is it amusing? No and no.
If we’re lucky, comic books last 32 pages, without counting the ads. If we’re not, it’s more like 25 or 27. But they’ll blow anywhere from 6%-10% of the book having Sunfire posing? Who the hell is writing this crap?
This is the very, very short version of just some of the stupidity in this issue.
For the rest of how stupid this issue was, see the review below, or at the original webpage.
But then, things got even worse. How?
Granted, in some ways, I think Catwoman’s outfit is more practical than Batman’s — there’s no loose fitting articles of clothing to be caught on nails, screws, the vents she crawls around in, etc. And, leather is good in knife fights. Batman’s outfit seems to have only recently made the cape practical, but I don’t keep up with these things.
The cat burglar and antihero has had an on again, off again relationship with Batman since Julie Newmar played her in the 1960s Batman tv show. Maybe longer.
But, no, decades of jumping Batman — sometimes literally — is apparently, too subtle.
Let’s have a full-on sex scene!!!!
Yes. Really. They went there.
Then again, I have a problem; I look at these images, and my first thought is “Why is her skin green? Has she been hanging out with Poison Ivy too much, or is it really odd mood lighting?”
So, what, exactly, does this entire sex scene add?
Another two to three pages eaten up by something that could probably be implied in one panel, and — oh, yeah — the next issue is called …. wait for it …. The Morning After.
Nope, still too subtle.
What do these pages add? Oh gee, Catwoman is taking his gloves off with her teeth. She’s a little frisky …. um, she dresses up in skintight leather and carries a whip, I think we got that part.
So …. what was the point of this exercise? Obviously, they’re going to continue this as a story line into the next issue. Good for them. So what? Why did they need two or three pages on this? Any one of you out there, reading this article right now, could have come up with a way to tell the audience that, yes, they are copulating. I suspect you could have done it in … what, half a page? With some internal monologue?
That a “professional author” has done it this pathetic.
Obviously, someone at DC has decided that its readers are either (a) functionally retarded, and subtlety would go over their heads, (b) too young to get legal access to get this stuff on their own or (c) the author used to write fan fiction before this.
The author, Judd Winick, is one of the masterminds behind resurrecting Robin #2, Jason Todd — who was so despised, fans voted to have him beaten to death and blown to kingdom come.
Winick’s brilliant idea: resurrect Todd, and make him crazy. So, I suspect we can’t expect too much from this guy. His claim to fame also seems to be LGTBQ awards and praise.
In short: this was no way to treat halfway decent characters. Catwoman has had a long run by dancing on both sides of the law, and living in a gray area that makes her more interesting than Batman at times … and more sane (I think Batman was on his fourth nervous breakdown before the reboot, last I checked). Starfire, for all the oversexed portions of her nature, has been entertaining for reasons other than that — she had a run on Infinite Heroes, where she had some great character moments, and anytime the oversexed nudist part of her came out, it was a source of quick entertainment, and then we moved on to the plot.
Pity DC comics has no memory.
This was only the beginning of DC’s New 52. Is there any surprise that this “All-New” format is already going the way of the dodo? Seriously, DC’s massive, world-shaking events had reshaped the universe repeatedly, up to 2011. Then they screwed it up, and they are desperately trying to undo all of it. They started their series with lowering their standards, aiming for the slow, the stupid, and the shallow. I would even say that they were subversive, but that would require DC to put some thought into it. It started stupid, and it will end in stupid.
DC should have aimed higher. They may not be scrambling right now to fix everything.